Why Peloton Is Selling on Amazon – The New York Times - eComEmpireStore + Brought to You By: Robert Villapane Ramos



Why Peloton Is Selling on Amazon – The New York Times

AdvertisementSubscriber-only NewsletterThe dream was to sell directly to customers. Now Peloton is on Amazon, Casper is in a furniture shop, and it’s awkward.Send any friend a storyAs a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.By Shira OvideEarlier this summer, I bought an online mattress — in […]

Subscriber-only Newsletter
The dream was to sell directly to customers. Now Peloton is on Amazon, Casper is in a furniture shop, and it’s awkward.
Send any friend a story
As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.

Earlier this summer, I bought an online mattress — in a boring, conventional store.
Let me explain why my personal transaction reveals the shrinking of a Silicon Valley dream.
One of the Big Ideas of the past decade in technology and shopping was that far more products would skip stores and instead sell their stuff directly to us online.
The thinking of upstarts like the sneaker company Allbirds, the eyeglass company Warby Parker, the mattress seller Casper and the cosmetics brand Glossier was that the old ways of making and selling products and finding customers should be imploded. They wanted to be able to control their own destiny and not share revenue with a retailer.
Companies in that category — the industry term is “direct to consumer” brands, but ugh to that term — often manufactured products in their own factories, used ads on Facebook or paid social media influencers to promote their products, interacted with their customers like they were friends and sold us stuff from their own websites.
We wouldn’t have a relationship with Cheerios (I think?), but people felt a connection to Dollar Shave Club or Fashion Nova, an online clothing company.
Tesla and the indoor fitness company Peloton fit this mold, too. Tesla makes cars in its own factories and it attracts customers through Elon Musk’s tweets, and people buy Teslas directly from the company. No Big Jim’s car dealership is needed. (More on Peloton in a minute.)
If this all seems completely normal to you, it’s because this Big Idea has changed our habits.
It’s now natural — particularly if you’re under 30 — to see a swimsuit worn by a prominent athlete you follow on Instagram and decide to buy it without ever seeing that one-piece in a store or knowing anything about the manufacturer. Phenomena like Instagram-famous cookware and the blockbuster Chinese fashion app Shein are signs that the direct-to-consumer idea has worked.
But perhaps only to a point. Let me go back to that mattress.
I walked into the furniture store Raymour & Flanigan, and was surprised that many of the mattresses in the showroom came from brands, like Casper and Purple, that had started with the premise of skipping stores.
I’ve told you before about the struggles of Casper and some other young companies that took too much of investors’ money, didn’t always spend it wisely and hit hard times. That is one reason Casper is willing to sell its products in more places where people are already shopping.
But this is not Casper’s problem alone. The reality of the Big Idea is that it is HARD and expensive to make mattresses, shoes, jeans or eyeglasses, and then persuade people to love them and buy them. And then buy them again.
It is only becoming more expensive to buy ads on what were once relatively affordable social media sites like Facebook. And straight talk: Do you really want to have feelings about your mattress brand? All of that work that goes into persuading customers to like a product and then find the product and buy the product, it’s exhausting.
Selling in stores is a shortcut. You don’t have to persuade people to go to Walmart, Amazon or a furniture store. They’re already there, and if not, it’s the retailer’s job to lure people inside.
Many of the young companies that started with the premise of skipping stores are now, like Casper, selling in stores — both ones they own and more strikingly, those of conventional retailers. Allbirds shoes are now sold in Nordstrom department stores, and the company said earlier this month that stores are its main source of growth in the United States.
Peloton said on Wednesday that it would sell its indoor bicycles and other fitness gear on Amazon in the United States. On Amazon?!?
Peloton wouldn’t be selling on Amazon if the company hadn’t struggled to manage the pandemic-related surge of indoor bike buying and then the inevitable comedown of demand. (Peloton on Thursday reported a $1.2 billion quarterly loss.) But the decision also shows that limiting your potential customer base to only those you can find directly has its challenges.
Allbirds sells only Allbirds shoes, but you can browse Nordstrom for a bunch of different brands, and buy a handbag, too. Just about every brand, including Oreos and Clorox, now wants to sell some of its products directly to shoppers. But come on. Do we want to go to 30 websites to buy everything we need? Isn’t it easier to drive to Costco or scroll through the Amazon app?
These product sellers born in the past decade have changed shopping and our minds. Casper has established an identity out of nowhere, to the point where it is compelling enough to stand out in a sea of mattresses in a furniture store. Peloton has created a name for itself that (maybe) can shine through Amazon’s vast mall.
But there’s nothing particularly Big Idea-like about that. Those companies have built a brand identity, like Nike and Toyota did. And now they’re doing a lot of what Nike and Toyota did by selling stuff the old-fashioned way.
Tip of the Week
Brian X. Chen, the consumer technology columnist for The New York Times, explains those iPhone pop-up alerts from apps that want to follow us around, and what you can do to limit companies snooping on you.
Apple made big waves last year when it introduced App Tracking Transparency. It’s basically a pop-up window that appears when you install a new iPhone app, asking for permission to track you and share your data with third parties so you see more relevant ads.
You might find those ads creepy. But even if you tap, “Ask App Not to Track,” app developers are finding other ways to watch what we do.
Here’s why, and two steps to limit the snooping if you prefer.
Apps and websites often collect oodles of information just from what you do on their sites and show ads based on that activity. If you follow a bunch of fashion brands on Instagram, you’ll likely see lots of clothing ads when scrolling through your feed. (This is called first-party tracking.)
To limit those personalized ads:
Install an ad blocker. You can install add-ons that block ads from loading in a web browser. My favorite one for computer browsers is uBlock Origin, and on iPhones I recommend 1Blocker. (For Android users, Google banned many ad blockers from its official Play app store.)
Wherever you can, opt out of interest-based advertising. Tech companies including Google, Facebook, Twitter and Apple offer instructions to say no to ads that are tailored to your browsing or buying habits and interests. You will still see ads, but the companies won’t target them to your interests.
Propaganda for America: Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Twitter deleted an online influence campaign that had promoted U.S. foreign policy interests outside America, my colleagues Sheera Frenkel and Tiffany Hsu reported. They wrote that the covert online propaganda employed the disinformation tactics used by China, but this time to praise American values and actions and attack those of other countries, including China and Russia.
Amazon is shutting down a service to provide primary and urgent health care. Raise your hand if you knew that Amazon Care existed.
It’s online fame in miniature: There are huge online celebrities who do everything for the ’Gram, and then there are the cult followings of niche internet micro-celebrities, as The Washington Post reported. Regular people, like an operating room nurse, Bryce Wollmann, are just having fun online and happen to have caught on with some fans. (A subscription may be required.)
Ravi the red panda was on the lam after escaping from a zoo in Adelaide, Australia. It turned out that Ravi was found snoozing in a fig tree in a nearby park.
Read past On Tech columns here.
We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.